<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

	<title type="text">OnWired Blaugh! &amp; Bookmarks</title>
	<subtitle type="text">OnWired Blaugh! &amp; Bookmarks: The Big Combo! Featured articles and bookmarks...what more could you want?</subtitle>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://onwired.com/onwired/combo_feed/" />
	<updated>2012-05-03T18:27:58Z</updated>
	<rights>Copyright (c) 2012 OnWired LLC</rights>
	<generator uri="http://expressionengine.com/" version="1.7.0">ExpressionEngine</generator>
	<id>tag:onwired.com,2012:04:23</id>

	
	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; If you build it, they will come&#8230;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/if-you-build-it-they-will-come/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2012:blog/1.526</id>
		<published>2012-04-23T16:03:57Z</published>
		<updated>2012-05-03T18:27:58Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Greg Williams</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Marketing" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/marketing/" label="Marketing" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					Well&#8230; Maybe. If you&#8217;re building a water well. In the desert. <br>(Or writing an implausible movie script.)
					<p>A long time ago (<a href="http://www.popculturemadness.com/Music/Charts/2009.html" rel="external">2009</a>), in a land far far away (<a href="http://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/europe/deeu.gif" rel="external">Germany</a>) I traveled to Cologne on business. We stayed at the <a href="http://www.radissonblu.com/hotel-cologne" rel="external">&#8220;Radisson Blu&#8221;</a> - which was appropriately swank for our meeting: sauna, rec room, breakfast, bar, customer service - it was truly <a href="http://www.forvo.com/word/par_excellence/" rel="external">par excellence.</a> 
</p>

<p>
But, that&#8217;s not what made this trip classically interesting.
</P>
<p>
As it happened, I forgot something in the dining room (as I am prone to do) so I headed back to the &#8220;lift.&#8221; As I stepped into the elevator, who&#8217;s standing there in the corner? Kevin Costner. Yes - of all actors, I get Kevin Costner.
</p>
<p>
So, imagine this - no entourage, just me and Kevin riding the elevator up @ Radisson Blu. It went a little like this:
</p>


<blockquote><p>So&#8230; what brings you to Cologne, Kevin? <em>(<&#8212; I&#8217;m on a first name basis with everyone)</em><br><br>
Oh - I&#8217;m touring with my band, &#8220;Modern West.&#8221;<br><br>
I didn&#8217;t know you had a band??<em> (Water World and now THIS?)</em><br><br>
Yea, we&#8217;ve been doing this a few years now. We do classic American rock and country.<br><br>
Cool.<em> (Country?)</em><br><br>
We&#8217;re playing tonight, you should come out and see us - we&#8217;re dow-<em>(&lt;zoned out @&#8221;country&#8221;&gt; &#8230;Geez, why Kevin? It could have been Elizabeth Banks - she&#8217;s smart, funny&#8230; or who&#8217;s that chick from Underworld again? She&#8217;d be good, why not her? I wonder what we&#8217;re eating for dinner tonight&#8230; - Kate! Kate Beckinsale. Bragging rights for sure&#8230; But Kevin? OMG - is he still talking about his band? Let&#8217;s talk about why you can&#8217;t do a British accent<a href="http://movies.about.com/od/toppicks/tp/Worst-Movie-Accents.htm" rel="external">&#8230;</a>)</em>
</p></blockquote>
<p>
We continued chatting a bit (which honestly was quite enjoyable) trying to figure out where the place was - he didn&#8217;t know (&#8220;my people plan that stuff&#8221;). 
</p>
<div class="screenshot-small"><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/portfolio/MrBrooks.png" width="210" alt="Hello there..." />&#8220;Hello there&#8230;&#8221;</p></div>
<p>But the real entertainment started when he missed pressing the button for his floor. He got pissed, dropping F bombs every 3rd word. Finally! Language I can understand!! 
</p>
<p>
Yes, it was a right fine time hangin&#8217; with Mr. Brooks the <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cosofractor" title="country soft rocker/actor" rel="external">cosofracter</a> (country soft rock actor). He&#8217;s a guy like the rest of us. He&#8217;s just famous. And rich.
</P>
<p>
What does this have to do with marketing? Ok, ok - hold on - I&#8217;m getting there!
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<p>
Ok, I&#8217;m there.
</p>
<p>
<h4>The Importance of Self-Promotion</h4>
</p>
<p>
Before now, did you know Kevin Costner - one of the most famous actors on the planet - had his own <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpgmOObaTE8" rel="external">country style soft rock band?</a> No. Only the most avid Costner fans would know this. It is not promoted.</p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s not marketed. </strong>
</p>
<p> 
Promotion is important for success anywhere - even more so on the web. You can&#8217;t just publish pretty bits and bytes on the webisphere and expect people to know you exist, much less get the leads coming in. Nay friends. Naaaaay. It&#8217;s a sea of over <a href="http://www.newsofdelhi.com/internet/how-many-websites-are-there" rel="external">300 million sites</a> and billions of pages out there. 
</P>
<p>
Here&#8217;s a mind blowing number for you, search <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=web+design" rel="external">&#8220;web design.&#8221;</a>  
<insert pic showing count of web results in goog search>
</p>

<p><strong>631,000,000 hits.</strong> <&#8212; that&#8217;s million. All 631 of them.  
</p>

<p>
Now search <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=web+design+raleigh+north+carolina" rel="external">&#8220;web design raleigh north carolina.&#8221;</a> 
</p>
<p>
<strong>13,000,000 hits</strong>
</p>
<p>
But what&#8217;s this? Say it with me now: <strong>&#8220;We&#8217;re #1!&#8221;</strong><em></em> (The top 3 positions are paid ads).
</p>
<blockquote><p>How do I get search traffic to *MY* site?</p></blockquote>
<p>
This is the magic of web marketing. If you only have a website, and no budget to feed it with leads, you&#8217;ll soon be up nights wondering: &#8220;Why isn&#8217;t anyone calling me? Where are my orders? How do I get search traffic to *MY* site???&#8221;
</p>
<p>
<h4>Au contraire, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097351/" rel="external">&#8220;Field of Dreams&#8221;</a></h4> 
</p>

<p>
<em>We built it, but they aren&#8217;t coming! </em>
</p>

<p>
Unless you have an established site, a well known brand, or a solid business network, your site will not see life for years - perhaps never (and that would be sad!) 
</p>
<p>Ask yourself: &#8220;What is my marketing budget? Do I spend that on radio? TV? print? the web?&#8221; This is a serious question: <strong>how are you going to get the word out there?</strong></p>
<p>
Today, the web offers you so many ways to interact with users on a personal and measurable level. I&#8217;m amazed businesses still spend so much money in other media. Channels like the obvious (Google AdWords), to the coming (LinkedIn) and to the extremely personal and tweakable (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc) are all ways you can better reach an audience with an ongoing and measurable result. You can clearly calculate the precise cost per click or impression. You can calculate ROI. All other media outlets are grey areas and some are dubious at best. And worse? They cost much more.
</p>
<p><h4>Naivety Goes For Broke</h4></p>
<p>
It is clear that building a site, a great site - no matter if it costs you $2500 or $250,000 - doesn&#8217;t matter. If you have no one coming to visit you, you have no business online. You just threw that money into a vast web vortex of bankrupt ideas. And it&#8217;s cold and dark in there. 
</p>
<p>
However, if you have a plan, and if you execute it properly, and measure it precisely - they will find you. And once they do, your investment in a solid site will pay off. 
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://onwired.com/contact/">Let us know how we can help!</a>
</p>
					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; Why are you building a website?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/why-are-you-building-a-website/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2012:blog/1.523</id>
		<published>2012-01-04T19:16:16Z</published>
		<updated>2012-04-27T02:37:17Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Greg Williams</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Marketing" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/marketing/" label="Marketing" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					Deep thoughts&#8230; on why our web exists. 
					<p>
<img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/blog/start_sign.jpg" width="220" style="float:left; margin-top:7px; margin-right:10px;" />
As with all advertising and marketing, your website exists for a very important reason: it&#8217;s the genesis of your sales efforts. However, many business owners I speak with - in fact, even some of our clients - don&#8217;t look at their web presence this way. Thus - I was inspired to write this article.
</p>
<p>
So&#8230; <h4>Why do you want a website?</h4>
</p>

<p>
Let&#8217;s get serious. The only purpose of using the web is to make sales - whether you are selling yourself as a personal brand, selling products, or selling a service - you&#8217;re in this game to drive sales. I cannot emphasize this point enough. Your site is an investment in your sales potential. Therefore - you need to look at your site as one of your sales force. 
</p>

<p>Obviously, there are some important distinctions. 
</p>

<p>First, your sales people can only reach one person at a time. Second, people create personal relationships with real handshakes, real meetings, and real phone calls. These relationships are incredibly valuable and cannot be replaced by any website, no matter how perfect it is.
</p>

<p>On the other hand, your website - similar to an advertisement - reaches 1000s of potential clients at the same time. But, it&#8217;s reach is much greater - we&#8217;re not talking about a meager local ad campaign, <strong>it&#8217;s global</strong>. Your site is communicating the quality of you, your products, and your services every single time a user hits your landing page. This can be very good&#8230; or very bad.
</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img class="OWphone" src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/blog/man_yelling.jpg" width="520" alt="Hopefully this isn't your sales guy..." />Hopefully this isn&#8217;t your sales guy&#8230;</p></div>

<p>
A sales person&#8217;s mistake may cost little to rectify. It can usually be managed. However, a mistake on the web may cost thousands of times that much. Those are missed sales, missed leads - unknown opportunities cost. 
</p>


<p>Your site greatly magnifies the impact of your sales efforts. Poor placement, poor copy, poor design choices, poor marketing efforts - these are immediately communicated to thousands of potential clients. If your site isn&#8217;t found, you are dead in the water (the web marketing component of web presence). If your site doesn&#8217;t resonate with your target demographic (if it&#8217;s not &#8220;sticky&#8221;), potential clients bounce out and find a competitor who does (the web design component). 
</p>

<h4>Holy snap judgement, batman!</h4>
<p>Research shows you &#8220;<em>have as little as 50 milliseconds</m> to capture the interest of potential customers. [&#8230;] first impressions can influence subsequent judgments of <em>website credibility and buying decisions&#8230;</em>&#8221; <a href="http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/blink/" rel="external">That&#8217;s 1/20th of a second folks! (Read More)</a>
</p>

<h4>Value your money</h4>
<p>You value your marketing and sales dollars. Even entry level sales positions can demand $30,000 salary every single year (not including training, expenses, management, office space, etc). Realistically though, you&#8217;ll be spending at least $50,000 and up. For that reason, when an account manager doesn&#8217;t perform, you let them go as fast as possible. Your marketing budget is a very significant spend - thousands to millions each month. If you aren&#8217;t seeing an ROI, you change tactics. Therefore, it is important to look at your web presence the same way. Your site is an extension of your sales and marketing arm &#8212; but it never sleeps. If it&#8217;s not converting leads or making sales, you need to let it go - in all likelihood it&#8217;s hurting you!
</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img class="OWphone" src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/blog/website.jpg" width="520" alt="Driving traffic" />What&#8217;s Driving and Converting Traffic Today</p></div>

<p>This all may seem pretty self-serving. We are a web marketing and design agency after all. But really - I&#8217;m not writing this to sell you our services. I am encouraging you to change how you look at the web. Any site is an investment of marketing dollars and you need to spend it wisely. If you&#8217;re not looking at the web as a sales tool, <em>why do you want a website?</em>
</p>

					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; WordPress Developer Wanted</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/wordpress-developer/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2011:blog/1.508</id>
		<published>2011-01-14T03:41:56Z</published>
		<updated>2011-01-14T11:17:57Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Tony Chester</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Jobs" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/jobs/" label="Jobs" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					OnWired is on the hunt for a WordPress developer.
					<p>Are you a web standards evangelist? Do you despise table-based layouts as much as we do? Can you wrestle CSS into submission and coerce WordPress to do your bidding? Do you get that special tingly feeling when you roll out a shiny new widget or plugin? If so, please keep reading.</p>

<p>OnWired, a full-service web design/development firm and all-around cool place to work, is on a quest to find our next superstar WordPress developer. We&#8217;re looking for someone with a creative mind, a keen understanding of user experience, exceptional communication skills, attention to detail, self-motivation, and the ability to hit the deadline every time.</p>

<p>On the technical side, you should be able to wrangle CSS, XHTML, WordPress, PHP, and SQL along with the occasional Javascript and AJAX. We&#8217;re not sticklers for fancy degrees. We just want someone who can get the job done.</p>

<p>You&#8217;ll get to work with a small, highly talented team of people who are incredibly passionate about what they do. We&#8217;ve got a part-time gig waiting for the right person and we really need someone who can hit the ground running.</p>

<p>Now we come to the pay-off. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to send your resume along with the world&#8217;s greatest cover letter to <a href="mailto:HireMe@OnWired.com" title="HireMe@OnWired.com">HireMe@OnWired.com</a>. Explain your love affair with web standards. Dazzle and amaze us with your past work. Promise us that if we hire you, all of our wildest dreams will come true. If you are convincing enough, we&#8217;ll be in touch.</p>

<p>If you run one of those outsourcing firms in India, please don&#8217;t email us offering to span the globe with your low-cost coding skills. And if you happen to be the widow of a deposed Nigerian military officer, we kindly decline your offer to share your immense wealth with us.</p>

<p>Please include your salary requirements when applying.</p>

<h5>Desired Technologies</h5>

<ul class="items">
<li>Modern Web technologies</li>
<li>WordPress</li>
<li>SQL</li>
<li>PHP</li>
<li>AJAX (all languages included)</li>
<li>Work within XHTML/CSS environments - no tables</li>
</ul>

<h5>Bonus Technologies</h5>
<ul class="items">
<li>ExpressionEngine</li>
<li>Drupal</li>
<li>jQuery</li>
<li>Have your own Wii-mote</li>
</ul>
					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; OnWired Client Go Realty Featured on American Express OPEN Forum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/onwired-client-go-realty-featured-on-american-express-open-forum/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.500</id>
		<published>2010-12-12T17:24:33Z</published>
		<updated>2011-01-04T16:36:34Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Tony Chester</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Community" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/community/" label="Community" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					Yet another example of what OnWired can do for you.
					<p>A few days ago I received a nice email from Jim Garman, the brilliant owner of Go Realty, advising me to check out an article about their website <a href="http://GoRealty.biz" title="GoRealty.biz">GoRealty.biz</a>. The article was titled &#8220;<a href="http://www.openforum.com/idea-hub/topics/technology/article/what-does-web-design-say-about-your-small-business-matt-silverman" title="What Does Web Design Say About Your Small Business?">What Does Web Design Say About Your Small Business?</a>&#8221; and was sitting on American Expresses OPEN Forum site. Needless to say, I was pretty excited for him&#8212;and for OnWired.</p> 

<p>Go&#8217;s approach to the busy landscape of real estate is much welcomed. They wanted to humanize the process and show we&#8217;re not another number to them.</p> 

<p>Don&#8217;t take my word for it, here&#8217;s what <a href="http://sixrevisions.com" title="Jacob Gube">Jacob Gube</a>, a well known peer in our industry, had to say about it:</p>

<blockquote><p>I think for a real estate company, they have a truly unique angle and they have a web design that manages to convey their core message.</p></blockquote>

<p>Check out the article. If you&#8217;re a business looking for a great website, <a href="/contact/" title="give us a shout">give us a shout</a> and see if we were made for each other.</p>
					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; WANTED: B. A. Baracus. OR &#8211; a System Administrator&#8230;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/wanted-bj-barracus.-or-a-system-administrator/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.499</id>
		<published>2010-12-10T23:45:52Z</published>
		<updated>2012-04-23T21:46:53Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Greg Williams</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Jobs" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/jobs/" label="Jobs" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					Quit yo jibba jabba and tell me what you need, sucka!  
					<p>What we need is a Sys Admin with core strengths in Linux, Networking and Web technostructure.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get serious:&#160; System Administration is no laughing matter.&#160; The needs are real.&#160; The risk is great.&#160; The probability of death is certain.&#160; But&#8230; Hannibal&#8217;s on the jazz and there is no stopping him now.</p>
<div><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/hannibalspage_002.jpg" alt="I love when a plan comes together." /></p></div>
<p><strong>Primary Directives:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>Recommend and implement an office-wide, secure  file sharing solution.&#160; Our team is both  local/internal AND distributed from USA to Australia. </li>
  <li>Recommend and implement an office-wide secure  archiving solution.</li>
  <li>Consolidate our web hosting.&#160; We currently have 4 providers hosting many  many sites.&#160; We need to consolidate to  one provider and migrate all the sites to the single host.</li>
  <li>Account for all domains and move to one domain  registrar.&#160; </li>
  <li>Clean up DNS entries.</li>
  <li>Setup tools for easy and secure remote  administration of user access.&#160; Users  must be managed and organized in groups (Sales, Accounting, Systems, etc).</li>
  <li>Implement tools for sharing/storing sensitive passwords</li>
  <li>Implement development and staging environments  for Rails (we run LMR (lemur) Linux/MySQL/Rails), &#160;WordPress, Expression Engine, and potentially  .NET.&#160; </li>
  <li>Ensure consistent Source Code management and  archival, and website archival.</li>
  <li>Recommend and implement new shared phone system  &#8211; routing + voicemail + conference.&#160;  Skype is ok, need something more robust.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Secondary Objectives:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>Integrate various project tools to ensure they  use plugins for intra tool communications.&#160;  (Pivotal Tracker to Project Management (undecided), to Basecamp, etc).</li>
  <li>Network traffic review of our connection to the internets  (is our network setup optimized for what we can afford?)</li>
</ul>
<div><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/BA.jpg" alt="Murdoch, just get in the car, fool!" /></p></div>
<p>That&#8217;s your piece of the plan. <a href="mailto:hireme@onwired.com?subject=System Administrator, Hard Core">Let us know if you&#8217;re in.</a></p>

					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; Wireframe Madness: The FREE Wireframe App Tourney &#8212; Round 4</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/wireframe-madness-the-free-wireframe-app-tourney-round-4/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.492</id>
		<published>2010-08-09T18:00:00Z</published>
		<updated>2010-09-13T16:17:51Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Megan</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Opinions" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/opinions/" label="Opinions" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					I had a quote from Samuel L. Jackson here, but then I remembered he was in Snakes on a Plane and decided against it.
					<p>It&#8217;s starting to get ugly in the wireframe arena. Rounds <a href="http://onwired.com/blog/wireframe-madness/" title="One">One</a>, <a href="http://onwired.com/blog/wireframe-madness-the-free-wireframe-app-tourney-round-2/" title="Two">Two</a>, and <a href="http://onwired.com/blog/wireframe-madness-the-free-wireframe-app-tourney-round-3/" title="Three">Three</a> reminded me of the  knee to face combos between <a href="http://www.ufc.com/event/UFC_107_PENN_vs_SANCHEZ/results" title="Penn vs. Sanchez">Penn vs. Sanchez</a> back in December. Ok, maybe it wasn&#8217;t that rough, but it&#8217;s been intense&#8230;</p>

<p> In the last round, <a href="http://www.lovelycharts.com" title="Lovely Charts">Lovely Charts</a> and <a href="http://www.creately.com" title="Creately">Creately</a> were neck and neck, but Creately won out overall. This week <a href="http://www.justproto.com" title="Justproto">Justproto</a> and <a href="http://www.gliffy.com" title="Gliffy">Gliffy</a> go head-to-head. 

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/wireframe_bracket4.gif" alt="Wireframe Madness Bracket" />Wireframe Madness Bracket</p></div>

<h4><a href="http://justproto.com/" title="Justproto">Justproto</a></h4>
<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img class="OWphone" src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/justproto.gif" alt="justproto" />justproto</p></div>

<h5>The Justproto Rundown:</h5>
<p>Free Templates: 1</p>
<p>Design: Interface 6/10 </p>
<p>Tools/Components: 8/10</p>
<p>Sharing:Public URL preview link</p>

<h5>Pros:</h5>
<ul>
<li>Customize interface with company logo</li>
<li>Auto save</li>
<li>Nice set of social icons, iab standard ads, and iphone/ipad/android tools</li>
<li>Collaboration and co-edit ability</li>
<li>Allows Master page templates</li>
<li>Simple prototyping ability</li>
<li>Rulers and grid with pixel increments</li>
<li>Easy edit of size, shape, color, border, etc of any item through properties tab </li>
</ul>

<h5>Cons:</h5>
<ul>
<li>No Export to pdf, png, or jpg.</li>
<li>1992 Windows-esk file icons used in interface&#8230; ok, maybe I&#8217;m biased here</li>
<li>Limited to One free page.</li>
<li>Bland Interface</li>
</ul>


<h4><a href="http://gliffy.com/" title="Gliffy">Gliffy</a></h4>
<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/gliffy.gif" alt="Gliffy" />Gliffy</p></div>

<h5>The Gliffy Rundown:</h5>
<p>Free Templates: Can&#8217;t even save one, 30 day trial unlimited</p>
<p>Design: Slightly cluttered interface 7/10</p>
<p>Tools/Components: 5/10</p>
<p>Sharing: Public URL, Embed, Export as: JPG, PNG, PDF</p>

<h5>Pros:</h5>
<ul>
<li>Share as image url or as site URL or embed in page</li>
<li>Collaboration ability</li>
<li>A few templates to choose from</li>
<li>Revision history toolbar</li>
<li>Spot color feature</li>
<li>Simple grouping and ungrouping</li>
</ul>

<h5>Cons:</h5>
<ul>
<li>Little focus on Wireframes</li>
<li>Not many tools</li>
<li>No measurement toolbars, or rulers.</li>
<li>Cluttered Interface</li>
<li>Can&#8217;t even save one template for Free &#8212; forced to sign up for 30 day trial.</li>
</ul>

<h4>Justproto vs. Gliffy &mdash; Final Score.</h4>
<p>Justproto does have a slightly dated, bland interface, but it&#8217;s positive point is it&#8217;s focus on wireframes. Gliffy falls short in the wireframe department and it&#8217;s other uses seem to come from totally different realms &#8212; floor plans, really? I&#8217;m going to give this one to the design underdog here; Justproto comes in first. The  wireframe tool set with iphone, ipad, android and correctly sized iab ads kick this application up a notch. Maybe the interface is 3 shades of white, but so what. At least it provides a simple layout and the ability to create a full page wireframe. Gliffy doesn&#8217;t even let you save your work until you sign up for the 30 day trial, what a hassle!</p>

<p>Wow, what a match! We have a double header lined up for next time with <a href="http://www.gomockingbird.com" title="Mockingbird">Mockingbird</a> vs. <a href="http://www.mockflow.com" title="Mockflow">Mockflow</a> in round 1 and <a href="http://www.creately.com" title="Creately">Creately</a> vs. <a href="http://www.justproto.com" title="Justproto">Justproto</a> in round 2. The final battle will then ensue&#8230;</p>
					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; The Design / Development Dilemma</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/the-design-development-dilemma/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.495</id>
		<published>2010-07-27T17:33:24Z</published>
		<updated>2012-04-24T21:11:25Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Greg Williams</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Development" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/development/" label="Development" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					&#8220;You got your peanut butter in my chocolate!&#8221; 
					<p>Back when <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore%27s_contributions_to_the_Internet_and_technology#1999_CNN_interview" title="Al Gore invented the internet">Al Gore invented the internet</a>, things were simple.  It started with 2 people destined to become inseparable: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol" title="TCP">TCP</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Protocol" title="IP">IP</a>.  IP&#8217;s the guy who talks to anyone he meets - he&#8217;s a shoe-in and somehow knows everyone. Seriously - his <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System" title="DNS">DNS</a> rolodex is fierce. TCP&#8217;s the cool chic who keeps the conversation alive.  She talks and listens, always offering support: &#8220;I understand&#8230;I really do.&#8221;  Together, TCP/ IP are the Internet.  And they&#8217;re good people.</p>

<p>But there was something missing.  They&#8217;re great communicators but, like vampiric xclones, they only work in total darkness.  Something needed to be done&#8230; </p>

<p>Enter our heroine: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Http" title=""HTTP."">&#8220;HTTP.&#8221;</a>  She got with TCP/IP and made the internet a whole lot more interesting.  Their hot hook caused the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_wide_web" title="world wide web">world wide web</a> and that&#8217;s when the party started.  Web servers stepped up, handling &#8220;requests&#8221; and &#8220;responses&#8221; and web browsers brought game turning formless ASCII characters into pictures and words. </p>

<p>
It wasn&#8217;t long until the world wide web witnessed its first miracle: the birth of truly horrific web pages.  Ugly monsters without style or any semblance of usability.  Indeed - the kinds of children only a system administrator could love&#8230;
</p>
<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/first.gif" alt="The First Webpage" />See what I mean? Horrific.</p></div>

<p>Fast forward to today in 2010 where some things that should not have been forgotten were lost. History became legend. Legend became myth. And after two and a half decades, the foundational science of the internet was lost and Designers took control of the web.</p>

<p>It makes sense really.  Web users see only the web interface: the user experience (UX) is almost 100% governed by designers. The only case where hard core backend developers have a &#8220;direct&#8221; impact on users is when a site is abhorrently slow or the site is practically useless in function (&#8220;Error 500: Internal server error&#8221;).  However, as users demand more complicated web applications, the Developer becomes more and more important because the code gets more and more complicated.  This, in turn, requires more and more sophisticated management efforts.  More and more&#8230; and more&#8230;  The days of a simple &#8220;Brochure Site&#8221; are dead.  The days of drag and drop, slide-out multi-layered dynamic interface, and commerce by default &#8220;Web Applications&#8221; are here.</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/interwebs.gif" alt="The Interweb: it&#8217;s not your great, great, grandfather&#8217;s internet..." />The Interwebs Today: it&#8217;s not your great, great, grandfather&#8217;s internet&#8230;</p></div>

<h4>Now, to the Point: the Great Divide</h4>
<p>The minds of Designers and Developers are totally different.  They are both creative but in completely different ways. Designers focus on what the user sees, developers focus on making it all work.  More than ever, it is critical that Designers and Developers understand each other&#8217;s limits and capabilities. </p>

<p>This is the Designer / Developer Divide: a rift of opposing forces, neither good nor bad.  The Ying and Yang.  The Chocolate and Peanut Butter.</p>

<h4>On Our Right: Designers</h4>
<p>Generally speaking, Designers face the primary problem of finding creative inspiration &#8211; which is not always easy.  It&#8217;s not like we&#8217;re all inherently born with every instantaneous creative impulse <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory" title="this Universe">this Universe</a> has to offer.  Inspiration comes randomly and sporadically and when you&#8217;re expected to produce for a full time job, that pressure can hamper your creative freedom.  Sometimes you just need a break to <a href="http://onwired.com/blog/dislodge-the-creative-block/" title="dislodge the creative block">dislodge the creative block</a>.</p>

<p>Once a Designer achieves the Nirvana of inspirational bliss, they build that slick beautiful interface everyone wants to see.  That&#8217;s exactly how OnWired rolls.  Yes.  It is cool.  It is beautiful.  But, is it possible?  A design element might be awesome, but then comes the reality check smack-down.  Adding a seemingly simple &#8220;Add to Cart&#8221; button to a slide out interface wireframe takes a Designer 12.34 seconds once they know where it should go.  However, that one small element might take hours to implement &#8211; especially if it&#8217;s an interface change and the code wasn&#8217;t already designed for it. (Yes, even here at the &#8220;ODub&#8221; hub, we deal with this issue regularly.) </p>

<h4>And The Left: Developers</h4>
<p>Developers are the often misunderstood, sociopath recluses forced to burn midnight oil to meet impossible deadlines. They are faced with the maddening task of logically forcing a web server and 5 different browsers to do as they are expected.  The Designer&#8217;s vision may be beautiful, but it&#8217;ll take 6 MONTHS to get it working.  This is a real problem for all software development.  The experience required by a Developer to understand how complex a feature is, how long it will take to get it working AND push back when it will extend the deadline is hugely valuable.</p>

<p>Not to put too fine a point on things, but design is only the tip of the iceberg &#8211; the backend code represents 90% of the effort.  Think about that.  If a project takes a year to complete, only a month of <a href="http://onwired.com/blog/time-keeps-on-tickin-tickin-tickin/" title="Work Days">Work Days</a> is needed for design.  The remaining 11 MONTHS is pure Development. That means a majority of the work we do as web professionals is never even seen by the client.  This is an unappreciated fact.  Therefore, updates must be frequently given to the customer to ensure they know what&#8217;s going on.</p>

<h4>The Solution: Build a Strong <a href="http://www.ehow.com/about_5398384_left-brain-right-brain-reseach.html" title="Corpus Callosum">Corpus Callosum</a></h4>
<p>Now that we understand the rift, it&#8217;s obvious that something needs to be done. TCP/IP and HTTP utterly depend on each other for survival.  Likewise, Developers and Designers utterly rely on each other to transcend interweb boundaries.</p>

<p>The solution to all of this is actually simple:  <strong>Ensure your designers and developers are communicating.</strong>  Only the dumbest of organizations would keep these two critical groups away from each other.  And guess what?  This means it&#8217;s up to the corpus callosum, the people managing the project and customer, to bridge that left and right divide. </p>

<p>Designers need to take into account the cost of interface elements. Developers need to know when to push the envelope of possibility and when to say, &#8220;Dude, breaking that sound barrier is going to take 6 months of serious pain.&#8221;  Project Managers need to keep the interests of all sides in balance: Customers, Designers, and Developers.</p>

<p>Be sure both a Developer and Designer are together in project brainstorming meetings. And don&#8217;t let people shut down ideas - it&#8217;s important everyone is able to share thoughts openly. Being negative is a sure way to stop creativity in its tracks: keep it positive and constructive. I mean, imagine how lame Star Wars would have been if they&#8217;d listened to Commander Nageeto: &#8220;That&#8217;s impossible &#8211; we can&#8217;t build a space station with the power to destroy an entire planet!&#8221;  If Vader had not Force crushed his larynx, the Death Star would still be a fleeting dream dancing in the mind of the Emperor. </p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img class="OWphone" src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/deathstar.gif" alt="Death Star PWNage" />Death Star PWNage: &#8220;We&#8217;ll blow your planet up!&#8221;</p></div>

<p>Well there you have it: from the distant past to today. Understanding our roots and differences helps everyone move forward.  And the sooner, the better. I want to see a 3-D holographic fully interactive web interface in my lifetime.</p>

					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; Please Trust Your Designer</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/please-trust-your-designer/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.493</id>
		<published>2010-07-19T14:49:01Z</published>
		<updated>2010-10-12T13:57:25Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Jon Norris</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="The Very Best of OnWired" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/best-of/" label="The Very Best of OnWired" />
		
			<category term="Opinions" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/opinions/" label="Opinions" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					There is never an excuse to use Comic Sans. Ever.
					<p>Unless you&#8217;ve been hiding under a rock for the last week or so, you&#8217;ve probably heard a little something about LeBron James&#8217; decision to leave the Cleveland Cavaliers and join the Miami Heat. Heck, I do my best to completely ignore professional sports and even I know far too much about the brouhaha. LeBron did his best to create a media circus, but I&#8217;m not here to talk about him today.</p>

<p>Shortly after LeBron&#8217;s announcement, Cavaliers majority owner Dan Gilbert released one of the most epic rants of all time (written rant that is; I think Mel Gibson and Christian Bale are tied for most epic recorded audio rant). He has already received his fair share of heat (no pun intended) for his statement, including a nastygram from Jesse Jackson and a $100k fine from the NBA. But I&#8217;m not here to talk about that either.</p>

<div class="screenshot-small"><p><img class="OWphone" src="/images/blog/screenshots/promise_poster.gif" alt="I promise I will never use Hobo, Comic Sans or Papyrus ever again." />&nbsp;</p></div><p>Instead, I want to quickly address Mr. Gilbert&#8217;s font choice. Comic Sans? Seriously? Don&#8217;t you know that there&#8217;s never an excuse to use Comic Sans? For your poor taste in typography, you&#8217;ve been openly mocked all over the Interwebs. Just to help you remember not to commit this font faux pas again, I am ordering a copy of <a href="http://www.luredesigninc.com/pledge/" rel="external">this poster</a> for you.</a></p>

<p>And now, to the real meat of this post. I&#8217;m pretty sure Mr. Gilbert didn&#8217;t publish that letter to the Cavs&#8217; site by himself. He probably typed it out in a Word doc or in an email &mdash; or he might have even picked up a pen and paper to scribble it out &mdash; and then he passed it along to his web person for publishing. I can imagine Mr. Gilbert standing over his web person&#8217;s shoulder having the following conversation:</p>

<blockquote><p><strong>Dan Gilbert:</strong> <em>Verdana is much too boring of a font for an epic rant such as this. Use something more exciting. Something with sizzle. Use Comic Sans!</em><br /><br />

<strong>Web Person:</strong> <em>But sir, there&#8217;s never an excuse for using Comic Sans. It is a typographic abomination, singlehandedly responsible for swine flu, global warming, and Paris Hilton.</em><br /><br />

<strong>Dan Gilbert:</strong> <em>I&#8217;m serious. Use Comic Sans. It&#8217;s the best font ever!</em><br /><br />

<strong>Web Person:</strong> <em>But sir, font geeks from all over the world will ridicule you for this most egregious of errors.</em><br /><br />

<strong>Dan Gilbert:</strong> <em>I don&#8217;t care. Use Comic Sans. Now. Or you&#8217;re fired!</em><br /><br />

<strong>Web person:</strong> <em>Fine. No sense losing my job over it. As soon as your rant goes live, I&#8217;ll need to go lie in the shower in the fetal position for a while because using that font makes me feel so dirty&#8230;</em></p></blockquote>

<p>In my head, that&#8217;s pretty much how it played out. How do I know? Because it&#8217;s happened to me far too many times. </p>

<p>I always find it interesting when a client hires a designer because of their expertise but then decides to nitpick every decision they make. I can assure you that professional designers have got your best interest in mind. They know what they&#8217;re doing and they all want to create something truly incredible for you.</p>

<p>Don&#8217;t ask your designer to create a Flash intro for your site. Don&#8217;t try to force your designer to use Joomla when they say it&#8217;s totally wrong for your project. Don&#8217;t demand that your designer use Papyrus for your logo. That&#8217;s a really bad move &mdash; even if you happen to be James Cameron and you just produced the highest grossing film of all time. (Maybe I should order him one of the aforementioned posters too.)</p>

<p>The point is this: Trust your designer. Please. If your designer tells you that something is a bad idea, listen. Chances are that the designer is probably right.</p>
					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; To Web Marketeers: 3 Reasons Your SEO is Rusting</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/to-web-marketeers-3-reasons-your-seo-is-rusting/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.491</id>
		<published>2010-07-06T20:38:05Z</published>
		<updated>2012-04-25T01:36:06Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Greg Williams</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Marketing" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/marketing/" label="Marketing" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					Are you and Google speaking the same language?
					<p>There are few things as complicated as online marketing. You must combine the science of search engine indexing with high impact messaging that converts customer visits to sales. Knowing where to focus your marketing efforts and dollars
is important. Aside from getting lucky with a good viral marketing campaign, Search
Engine Optimization (SEO) is one of the best places to start. You have no hope of listing
organically on the first page of Google unless you put some significant thought into your
SEO strategy.</p>

<p>Few things are as misunderstood as SEO in the marketing world. Sure, the idea of SEO is
easy to understand &#8211; get your site listed front and center on Google, Yahoo, or Bing and
a veritable torrent of customers will flood your site filling your shopping cart with orders
or subscriptions. Yes well, Costner&#8217;s &#8220;Field of Dreams&#8221; was fiction &#8211; there&#8217;s no &#8220;build
it and they will come&#8221; here. With billions of pages out there, it&#8217;s complicated. You&#8217;re
competing with millions of sites for a small slice of billions of users. It&#8217;s truly a daunting
task and unfortunately, dreaming won&#8217;t help (just do a search on one of your key words
to see how many pages <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=zp&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=%22field+of+dreams%22&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=" title="Google">Google</a> returns).</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img class="OWphone" src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/traffic.gif" alt="The Interwebs - Without Indexing..." />The Interwebs - Without Indexing&#8230;</p></div>

<p>Given all that I&#8217;ve said there, let&#8217;s look at some basic reasons your SEO strategy isn&#8217;t panning the gold you hoped for.</p>

<h4>1. You want it all, and you want it now!</h4>
<p><strong>Patience is a virtue. </strong>Of course, this is one thing I lack myself&#8230; in impressively stellar ways really&#8230;  And no wonder &#8211; we live in a world where feedback is near instantaneous in everything we do.  But, in the world of SEO, you need to wait for web crawlers to pick up your page and index it.  As I said &#8211; with billions of pages to index, catalog and rate, this could take a while (as in 6 months &#8220;a while&#8221;).  Even then, you will be lucky to see your site show up in the first couple pages of results.  Furthermore, depending on how many other sites or businesses you&#8217;re competing with for specific key words, it could be a year or more before your site lists near the top. </p>

<h4>2. You&#8217;re not using the right words. </h4>
<p><i>&#8220;You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-b7RmmMJeo" title="Inigo Montoya">Inigo Montoya</a></i></p>
<p>So, you didn&#8217;t rigorously study industry trends to find the most relevant words? <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTtVVHg41kU" rel="external">Big mistake. Big. HUGE.</a> </p>

<p>
In SEO, words matter. One of the great ironies of SEO is that the money isn&#8217;t always where we think it is. In other &#8220;words&#8221;, even though we think a certain word or phrase is going to be profitable, your potential customers might be searching for word variations you didn&#8217;t key on &#8211; or something completely different.</p>
<p>Ultimately, when it comes to words, all we Web Marketeers can do is study trends, calculate metrics, and make an informed decision based on our assumptions. You can&#8217;t afford to drop the ball.  You need to keep adjusting your campaigns as you go along. Eventually, you&#8217;ll find the most profitable words that drive the most traffic.</p>

<h4>3. Users are knocking, but you&#8217;re not answering&#8230;</h4>
<p>Hits are pretty much useless if you have a 100% bounce rate.  If your users aren&#8217;t staying, buying, or clicking your ads, your site is just hemorrhaging krugerrands. <strong>You need to maximize your UX, design, and content impact. </strong><p>

<p>Of course, your SEO content is important &#8211; it&#8217;s what gets people to your door in the first place.  But don&#8217;t forget the importance of your customer&#8217;s experience on the site.  You need an easy interface where clients understand how to search or buy your products.  You need a compelling message that appeals to your client&#8217;s desires, dreams, or emotions to get them to want your products.  You need good &#8220;Calls to Action&#8221; to make it easy for them to see where to click.   And, the site needs to be useful enough and look good enough to keep them coming back again and again.</p>

<h4>The Exciting Conclusion</h4> <p>So keep all of this in mind &#8211; your search engine plan might actually be working.  Take the lesson of patience to heart and focus on great content for your customers so when the hits start coming, they have a reason to stay.  Keep refining your keywords &#8211; this is a never ending process in a world of constant change.  And experiment where appropriate - test and tweak different ideas to ensure buying ratios improve over time.  Remember, the goal here is not just driving traffic, <strong>it&#8217;s converting hits to sales.</strong></p>
					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; Web Templates vs Web Designers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/web-templates-vs-web-designers/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.490</id>
		<published>2010-06-28T18:02:00Z</published>
		<updated>2010-09-13T16:19:13Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Tony Chester</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Design" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/design/" label="Design" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					Gasp&#8230; you&#8217;re not considering a template are you?!?
					<p>A website is definitely a huge asset to those who want to promote themselves,
  their company, or their wares. People from all over the world use the Internet (<a href="http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm" title="for real?">1.8 billion to be exact</a>)
  to find all kinds of things &#8212; every day; providing a highly manicured website
  is a great way to capture their attention. </p>
<p>As with all things of importance, there are a few difficult choices that must
  be made during the process of getting a website up and running. The first decision
  that should be made about your website is whether you should have it custom
  designed and developed or if you should use a website template. </p>
<p><strong>Full disclosure:</strong> I am the owner of a pretty darn good web firm so take my
  comments in stride. I only speak the truth though. </p>
<h4>Templates Aren&#8217;t All Bad</h4>
<p>What is a template? Templates are pre-designed and pre-built websites that you
  can find on many a site. They range from &quot;I wouldn&#8217;t use that if you paid
  me&quot; to &quot;Wow &#8212; that is one awesome site&quot;. </p>
<p>They would make a perfect choice for those who want a website based more around
  functionality without all the bells and whistles of a custom design. They are
  usually much less expensive than sites built by a web designer. However, the
  low price does not mean that style is out of the question. There are literally
  endless numbers of templates to choose from and you&#8217;re sure to find one that
  suits your needs and taste after a bit of looking. With template designs, what
  you see is what you get; there is not much room for flexibility.</p>
<p>Using templates can also save a chunk of time. There&#8217;s no day dreaming and
  brainstorming with a hired designer, just a site that&#8217;s ready to be slightly
  edited. All that you have to do is find a design that you like and fill in
  the desired content, then put it up on the web for everyone to see. </p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img class="OWphone" src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/unique.jpg" style="border: 0;" alt="image" width="520" height="426" /> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nickwheeleroz/2205118143/" title="Be unique">Be unique</a> | <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.en">CC BY 2.0</a></p></div>

<p>Though there are many useful benefits to using templates, it&#8217;s not the right
  choice for everyone. One notable downfall of using pre-made layouts is that
  it is entirely possible that another person is using the same design. Any number
  of people are allowed to buy and use the same template, that is unless
  the &#8220;unique&#8221; price is paid, which is then getting into the realm of what a
  web designer would charge in the first place. Another thing to be wary of when
  deciding to use a template is the amount of website knowledge you may have.
  If you&#8217;re limited on the subject, you may have a tough time setting up
  and maintaining the site, let alone trying to get search engines to pick it
  up so others will find it. </p>
<p>Those who want a very specific design for
  their website are bound to be disappointed, since they probably won&#8217;t find
  exactly what they are looking for.</p>
<h4>Just Hire a Designer</h4>
<p>Another choice to keep in mind when trying to get a website running is to
  hire a web designer or a firm <a href="/contact/" title="such as us">such as us</a>.
  We specialize in designing, coding, and writing content for our clients&#8217; websites.
  A good designer can really give your website a cutting edge that you don&#8217;t
  usually see with templates. This is a great option for those who want an elaborate,
  impressive design that won&#8217;t be seen anywhere else. A lot of designers have
  a good grasp on how the Web works and making good impressions on those who
  visit their sites. </p>
<p>They are also skilled at taking your specific requests and making them into
  a functional, user-friendly system that is designed to attract attention from
  search engines. Web designers are beneficial to those who expect their website
  budget to grow, since they are usually happy to add new sections, pages, graphics,
  and more later on. Hiring a professional also comes in handy for those who
  don&#8217;t exactly understand websites. Web designers will deal with getting the
  website up and offer maintenance services if something were to go wrong.</p>
<p>Hiring a designer can be a great option for some people, but a few things
  should be taken into consideration before making the decision. The most obvious
  con to having a designer build a customized website for you is the price. Initially, a designer puts a larger dent in the bank than a template, but whipping that cheap template into shape is going to require lots of patience and a bit more cash than anticipated. </p>
<p>If you have a specific image in mind, be sure the designers you speak with
  have a portfolio showcasing the design style you&#8217;re looking for. That will
  definitely get you started on the right foot. </p>
<p>If you are looking for a designer, you must have knowledge on how to find
  a skilled professional who can be trusted with such an important project. Failing
  to do so would likely result in a major loss and a major headache. Don&#8217;t like
  the <a href="/portfolio/" title="samples in our portfolio">samples in our portfolio</a>? Check out <a href="http://sortfolio.com" title="Sortfolio.com">Sortfolio.com</a> for a rather large listing
  of designers across the country. Those with a very specific design in mind
  should understand that a good designer will argue any requests that could leave
  a bad impression on the site&#8217;s visitors, which will benefit their clients in
  the long run.</p>
<p>The moral of the story: if you have a very limited budget and are not very concerned about your brand, go for the template. If you have some money to spend and you want to supply your visitors with an experience unique to your brand, <a href="/contact/" title="hire us">hire us</a> or <a href="http://sortfolio.com" title="find">find</a> another firm that will make you happy. 
					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; Wireframe Madness: The FREE Wireframe App Tourney &#8212; Round 3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/wireframe-madness-the-free-wireframe-app-tourney-round-3/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.489</id>
		<published>2010-06-17T21:33:00Z</published>
		<updated>2010-09-13T16:20:31Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Megan</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Opinions" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/opinions/" label="Opinions" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					And the battle continues this week with Lovely Charts and Creately
					<p>Are you ready for the third round of the Wireframe Madness? If you missed the first or second round check them out here: <a href="http://onwired.com/blog/wireframe-madness/" title="First Round">First Round</a> & <a href="http://onwired.com/blog/wireframe-madness-the-free-wireframe-app-tourney-round-2/" title="Second Round">Second Round</a>.</p>

<p> The last round was a blow out between Cacoo and Mockflow. Mockflow easily took the cake. This week things may get ugly between Creately and Lovely Charts. 
Check out the score below. </p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/wireframe_bracket3.gif" alt="Wireframe Madness Bracket" />Wireframe Madness Bracket</p></div>

<h4> Let&#8217;s do this. </h4>

<h4><a href="http://lovelycharts.com/" title="Lovely Charts">Lovely Charts</a></h4>
<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/lovelycharts.gif" alt="Lovely Charts" />Lovely Charts</p></div>

<h5>The Lovely Charts Rundown:</h5>
<p>Free Templates: 1</p>
<p>Design: Interface 7/10 </p>
<p>Tools/Components: 6/10</p>
<p>Sharing: Export as PNG or JPG</p>

<h5>Pros:</h5>
<ul>
<li>Sitemap and Flowchart abilities along with Wireframes</li>
<li>Has built in grid feature</li>
<li>Arrange and Align feature</li>
<li>Color dropper tool</li>
<li>Built in Connection tool for user flow diagrams</li>
</ul>

<h5>Cons:</h5>
<ul>
<li>No page borders.</li>
<li> Some tools appear cartoony, some tools are irrelevant </li>
<li> Cannot share with a URL. Only exports to PNG or JPG.</li>
<li> Very limited on Wireframe tools</li>
<li> Limited to One free page.</li>
</ul>


<h4><a href="http://creately.com/" title="Creately">Creately</a></h4>
<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img class="OWphone" src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/creately.gif" alt="Creately" />Creately</p></div>

<h5>The Creately Rundown:</h5>
<p>Free Templates: Unlimited</p>
<p>Design: Slightly cluttered interface 7/10</p>
<p>Tools/Components: 7/10</p>
<p>Sharing: Share through email,  Export &mdash; JPG, PNG, PDF</p>

<h5>Pros:</h5>
<ul>
<li>Has a contact toolbar that connects items easily</li>
<li>Very nice social media icon set</li>
<li>Multiple template sets to choose from</li>
<li>Collaborate with Two people in Free version</li>
<li>Unlimited free templates</li>
<li>Has page borders</li>
</ul>

<h5>Cons:</h5>
<ul>
<li> Have to load web tools, not automatically in the library</li>
<li>Cluttered interface</li>
<li>When testing I got an error and lost my recent work</li>
</ul>

<h4>Lovely Charts vs. Creately &mdash; Final Score.</h4>
<p>This was a close race, but all-in-all Creately takes the gold. Lovely charts would have had more leverage if it offered more free templates &#8212; one template just doesn&#8217;t cut it, not even for sampling. Creately stepped up the game with it&#8217;s toolsets and templates, although that error message and losing work definitely gives me some cause for concern.</p>

<p>There we have it folks: another tight race ends, and another one bites the dust.  We still have three more battles to go until the final face-off, so stay tuned!</p>
					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; Using Datasets in Photoshop</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/using-datasets-in-photoshop/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.488</id>
		<published>2010-06-14T19:06:00Z</published>
		<updated>2010-09-13T16:23:01Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Chris Harrison</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Tutorials" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/tutorials/" label="Tutorials" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					Data and photoshop, a match made in heaven
					<p>This week I&#8217;ve decided to post something a little different.</p>

<p>Working with data in Photoshop (CS3+) is probably not something you&#8217;ve thought much about. In fact, I&#8217;ve only ever run into one case where using datasets and variables in Photoshop made sense to me, but once you know how to use them, you&#8217;re bound to find more and more reasons to use them.</p>

<p>This approach is a timesaver regardless of the amount of data you might have, but if you&#8217;ve only got a few lines of data to work with, creating each PSD by hand might save time compared to this method.</p>

<h4>Practical Applications:</h4>

<ul>
<li>Mailing labels</li>
<li>Custom postcards, flyers, etc.</li>
<li>Creating ordered price or number-based images</li>
<li>And so on&#8230;</li>
</ul>

<p>First, we need some data to work with. For this example, I&#8217;ve created a simple list of names and addresses in Google Docs. The first cell of each column is important. We&#8217;ll use these names when we define variables to work with in Photoshop later on. Once my spreadsheet is ready, I export the file as a CSV.</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="/images/blog/screenshots/datasetimg1.png" alt="Figure 1. Example of demo data as seen in Google Docs" />Figure 1. Example of demo data as seen in Google Docs</p></div>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="/images/blog/screenshots/datasetimg2.png" alt="Your CSV should end up looking something like this:" />Your CSV should end up looking something like this:</p></div>

<p>Once we have our data, we&#8217;ll need to create something in Photoshop that can take advantage of it. With a list of names and addresses we could create custom envelopes, postcards, name badges, you name it. For this example, we&#8217;re going to keep it simple and create a Galactic Empire email signature graphic/mailing label sort of thingy:</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="/images/blog/screenshots/datasetimg3.png" alt="Galactic Empire" />Galactic Empire</p></div>

<p>In the above screenshot you can see I&#8217;ve created a pretty basic PSD with the Galactic Empire Logo (Layer 1), five text layers and a plain white background layer. Now comes the fun part. <strong>Go to Image > Variables > Define.</strong> Select Name from the Layer dropdown.</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="/images/blog/screenshots/datasetimg4.png" alt="Select Name from the Layer dropdown" />Select Name from the Layer dropdown</p></div>

<p>We need to make sure that each column of data we have in our spreadsheet coincides with a variable. <strong> Select a Layer from the layer dropdown</strong> (such as Name). Then <strong>check the checkbox next to Text Replacement and set the name to Name</strong>, so it&#8217;ll match the column name from our spreadsheet. Continue doing this for each column/layer until finished.</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="/images/blog/screenshots/datasetimg5.png" alt="Next, we need to create our Data Set." />Next, we need to create our Data Set.</p></div>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="/images/blog/screenshots/datasetimg6.png" alt="Next, we need to create our Data Set." />Next, we need to create our Data Set.</p></div>

<p><strong>Click the import button</strong> and it&#8217;ll open an Import Data Set window. <strong>Select the CSV file</strong> you&#8217;ve created. Make sure the checkboxes are checked. You&#8217;ll also want to make sure that you&#8217;ve already created your variable associations and the names match your column headings in the CSV. If they don&#8217;t match you WILL get errors.</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img class="OWphone" src="/images/blog/screenshots/datasetimg7.png" alt="If you've done everything right, you'll see something like this." />If you&#8217;ve done everything right, you&#8217;ll see something like this</p></div>

<p>You&#8217;ll now be able to select from the various Data Sets you&#8217;ve created and your PSD will get updated with the results. Once you click OK, save your document.</p>

<p>Now we&#8217;re turn each Data Set into its own PSD. <strong>Do this by going to File > Export > Data Sets as Files</strong>.</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="/images/blog/screenshots/datasetimg8.png" alt="Output and naming" />Output and naming</p></div>

<p><strong>Select a folder for output. Set your naming convention. Click OK.</strong> In a matter of seconds you&#8217;ll have PSDs for every single data set.</p>

<p>Once you have a folder full of PSDs, your best bet would be to <strong>create an action that Saves for Web</strong> and then run a batch process that applies the action to each file. I&#8217;ll cover that in my next post.</p>



					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; iPad Stolen&#8212;Finders Keepers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/ipad-stolen-from-onwired/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.486</id>
		<published>2010-06-02T14:41:00Z</published>
		<updated>2010-06-04T18:03:59Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Tony Chester</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Community" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/community/" label="Community" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					Locate the iPad and it is yours to keep &#8212; we just need the data
					<h4>*****INTERAGENCY MEMO*****</h4>

<p>OnWired HQ infiltrated. Enemy agent escaped with iPad.
Your objective: <strong>locate agent and recover device.</strong></p>

<p>First operative to complete mission will receive iPad.</p>

<p>Intel on enemy agent&#8217;s whereabouts to be distributed 
via Twitter. Follow <a href="http://twitter.com/onwired" title="Twitter with OnWired">@onwired</a> to be kept apprised.</p>

<p>The search has begun. If you&#8217;ve figured something out, <a href="http://discuss.hunttheipad.com">share what you know</a>.</p>
					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; Wireframe Madness: The FREE Wireframe App Tourney &amp;mdash; Round 2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/wireframe-madness-the-free-wireframe-app-tourney-round-2/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.484</id>
		<published>2010-05-24T15:00:00Z</published>
		<updated>2010-05-24T11:15:51Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Megan</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Opinions" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/opinions/" label="Opinions" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					This week Mockflow and Cacoo go head-to-head.
					<p>It&#8217;s time.</p>
<p>The second round of the Wireframe Tourney is about to begin. If you missed the first round, STOP right now, and <a href="http://onwired.com/blog/wireframe-madness/" title="go read it">go read it</a>.</p>

<p> As I&#8217;ve already mentioned, each app will be scrutinized and ranked on &#8220;free-ness&#8221;, interface design, tool set, and other miscellaneous pros and cons, two at a time. This weeks battle is between Cacoo and Mockflow. Only one app will reign superior and move on to the next bracket.</p>

<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/wireframe_bracket2.gif" alt="Wireframe Madness Bracket" />Wireframe Madness Bracket</p></div>


<h4> Are you ready to rumble? </h4>

<h4><a href="http://cacoo.com" title="Cacoo">Cacoo</a></h4>
<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/cacoo.gif" alt="Cacoo" />Cacoo</p></div>

<h5>The Cacoo Rundown:</h5>
<p>Free Templates: Unlimited</p>
<p>Design: <a href="http://disney.go.com/create/#/create/" title="Disney">Disney</a>-like Interface 6/10 </p>
<p>Tools/Components: 6/10</p>
<p>Sharing: Co-edit, Public URLs,  Export &mdash; PNG</p>

<h5>Pros:</h5>
<ul>
<li>Has Sitemap and Flowchart abilities as well as Wireframes </li>
<li>Co-editing Feature </li>
<li>Can chat with other Cacoo users </li>
<li>Has separate text, image, and line tools that aren&#8217;t pre-formatted. </li>
<li>Can copy and paste styles </li>
</ul>

<h5>Cons:</h5>
<ul>
<li>Can only export as PNG </li>
<li>Page template is very open, no page borders. </li>
<li> Tools are cluttered with useless icons like smiley faces and office layout icons?&#8230; </li>
<li> Interface seems childish &mdash; not very professional </li>
<li> Wireframe ability seems like an afterthought </li>
</ul>


<h4><a href="http://mockflow.com" title="Mockflow">Mockflow</a></h4>
<div class="screenshot-big"><p><img src="http://onwired.com/images/uploads/mockflow.gif" alt="Mockflow" />Mockflow</p></div>

<h5>The Mockflow Rundown:</h5>
<p>Free Templates: 4</p>
<p>Design: Dark, clean interface 8/10</p>
<p>Tools/Components: 9/10</p>
<p>Sharing: Private setting, Public URLs,  Export &mdash; PNG, PPT, PDF </p>

<h5>Pros:</h5>
<ul>
<li>Has Sitemap and Flowchart abilities as well as Wireframes</li>
<li>Mockstore: user shared tool imports (ipad and iphone components)</li>
<li>Invite co-editors, live chat with co-editors</li>
<li>Tool set: Social, payment, security icons.</li>
<li>Simple clean interface. Very professional.</li>
<li>Templating and duplication function</li>
<li>Auto sitemap creation</li>
<li>Built-in 960 grid!</li>
<li>Paste-in-place functionality, and grouping! </li>
</ul>

<h5>Cons:</h5>
<ul>
<li> Not very free, but $4.91 a month isn&#8217;t bad.</li>
<li>Page template is very open, wish page borders were more prominent</li>
</ul>

<h4>Mockflow vs. Cacoo &mdash; Final Score.</h4>
<p>Honestly, this wasn&#8217;t much of a competition. Mockflow blew Cacoo out of the water. Cacoo does have collaboration tools like co-editing and chat, but Mockflow just makes Cacoo look like a toy. One big set back to Mockflow is that it only offers 4 page templates for free. $4.91 is a strange price, but come on, that&#8217;s cheap for all that Mockflow offers: Seemingly endless templates and components, 960 grid, private and public sharing&#8230;</p>

<p>Game two down, Cacoo was taken to the slaughter house by Mockflow.  Tune in next time for the <a href="http://lovelycharts.com/" title="Lovely Charts">Lovely Charts</a> and <a href="http://creately.com/" title="Creately">Creately</a> showdown!
					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>

	<entry>
		<title>&#8226; Time Keeps On Tickin&#8230; Tickin&#8230; Tickin&#8230;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://onwired.com/blog/time-keeps-on-tickin-tickin-tickin/" />
		<id>tag:onwired.com,2010:blog/1.482</id>
		<published>2010-05-17T15:43:23Z</published>
		<updated>2012-04-25T01:34:25Z</updated>
		<author>
			<name>Greg Williams</name>
			<uri>http://onwired.com</uri>
		</author>
		
			<category term="Business" scheme="http://onwired.com/blog/archive/archive/business/" label="Business" />
		<content type="html"><![CDATA[
							
					The measure of a man (or woman) hour.
					<p>Today, I want to talk about man hours, the act of creation, and the big bang theory. But I&#8217;ll only talk about man hours.</p>

<p>Many are not aware of the difference between an hour, a man hour, and a woman hour. So, let&#8217;s address that first.</p>

<p>An <strong>HOUR</strong> is a collection of 60 minutes. Usually consecutive. Actually, always consecutive, and this is important as you will later see.  Henceforth I dub thee: &#8220;Clock Hours.&#8221;</p>

<p>A <strong>MAN hour</strong> is an hour filled with grunts on a sofa, one hand half down the pants and a beer in the other, lots of belching, and screaming aimlessly at the TV when the ref totally misses a call.  &#8220;Oh C&#8217;MON REF!!  BAD CALL!!&#8230;&#8221; usually followed by unprintable expletives.</p>

<p>A <strong>WOMAN hour</strong> is only slightly less known.  This can be easily consumed going to get ready for a night out on the town &mdash; like ballet for example (a direct affront to the aforementioned man).  Now, I don&#8217;t really know exactly what goes on in there for an hour, but I do know she comes out looking fantastic, so I try not to complain.  Inside every woman is an artist.  It&#8217;s just that some take a little longer to express themselves.</p>

<h4>A Terrible Compromise</h4>
<p>This whole confusion between man and woman hours caused us to come up with a new term to describe &#8220;a unit of production equal to the work one person can produce in an hour.&#8221;  But we don&#8217;t call it work hour or anything useful and understandable.  We maintain a gender neutral tone, and we call it a &#8220;Person Hour.&#8221;  This is somehow less offensive than &#8220;Man Hour.&#8221;  We originally didn&#8217;t go with &#8220;Woman Hour&#8221; because it was too long to say.  Man Hour was much more efficient (taking 33% less time to grunt).  Now, we say &#8220;Person Hour&#8221; which is even worse. </p>

<p>All that said, and on a more serious note, I&#8217;m going to say <strong>&#8220;Work Hour&#8221;</strong>, which means &#8220;Man Hour&#8221;, &#8220;Person Hour&#8221;, and &#8220;A unit of production equal to the work one person can produce in an hour.&#8221;  &#8220;Work Hour&#8221; &mdash; it means what is says, and it says it in 33% less time&#8230;</p>

<h4>What is a Work Hour?</h4>
<p>So, what is a work hour?  What does it mean to say we spent 3 work hours on a work package?  What does it mean when we estimate &#8220;40 Hours of Project Management?&#8221;</p>

<p>Whenever we spend time working on a project, we are using people&#8217;s time to achieve a goal.  In Project Management, we have a project with an overall goal that we break down into smaller goals called &#8220;Work Packages&#8221; and then those are broken down into even smaller goals called &#8220;Tasks&#8221; and &#8220;Milestones&#8221;.  Tasks each have a certain amount of time it takes to complete them.  Milestones are a beautiful momentous occasion worthy of celebration&#8230; like &#8220;Internal Quality Check Sign-Off.&#8221;  See?  Easily a beer right there.</p>

<h4>Bring it Home, G.</h4>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at a typical design review meeting.  After our designer has spent several creative hours (&#8220;Creative Hour&#8221; is a topic for a different day) working up initial design mockups, we review them internally to ensure they meet our own high standards and our client&#8217;s expectations.  Let&#8217;s say there are 3 different designs, and 2 levels (home page and secondary page).  That&#8217;s 6 designs that must be reviewed. Participating in this meeting are the designer(s), the project manager, and the Creative Director.  We&#8217;ll assume only 3 people for now, but for larger projects we frequently have more than one designer to ensure we capture different perspectives.  If each design takes 15 minutes to review, critique, make notes on, and make suggestions for improvement (and this is a conservative average), then we have absorbed 1.5 Clock Hours out of our 24 hour day.  However, that is not the cost to the company.  The actual cost of that meeting is &#8220;Clock Hours&#8221; X &#8220;Number of People Working.&#8221;  Therefore, in this one meeting that lasted 1.5 Clock Hours, there are actually 4.5 Work Hours consumed. </p>

<p>That&#8217;s right &mdash; 4.5 Work Hours to review 6 different designs.  So, if we keep numbers simple and value $100/hr per person&#8217;s time, that one meeting to review 3 different design templates 2 levels deep cost $450.</p>

<p>This same thing happens in your own company.  Even if you aren&#8217;t calculating it, it&#8217;s happening.</p>

<h4>Another Almost Laughable Example. Almost.</h4>
<p>I worked for a Global Fortune 500 company prior to this.  I was in meetings ALL. THE. TIME.  Well, one of those times involved the review of an internal &#8220;productivity message&#8221; with the senior executive team. There were 3 guys all getting paid north of $500,000, CEO over $800,000 (these are all &#8220;AT LEAST&#8221; figures), then 7 of us with one person presenting.  Each of us made 6 figures.  This meeting lasted an hour.  Obviously, the hourly rate is much higher in this case, especially considering all the other massive expenses (facilities, plush offices, insurance, telepresence and other high end technology).  Let&#8217;s be nice and make the average rate about $300.  It was probably closer to $400 including all other supporting expenses.  Now, let&#8217;s discuss the actual cost of just one 1 Clock Hour meeting.</p>

<p>10 people X 1 Clock Hour = 10 Work Hours.  10 Work Hours X $300/hr = $3000.</p>

<ul><li>Meeting on &#8220;Mundane Topic&#8221;: $3000.</li>
<li>Full realization that corporate life was draining my soul? &gt; 6 years.</li>
<li>Freedom from bondage?  Priceless. </li></ul>

<p>So when we say 40 hours of Project Management or 120 Hours of Development, you know it&#8217;s not one person sitting at a desk happily twiddling their thumbs.  They are busy coordinating with many other people, sometimes more than 5 at once, and this is time that adds up very quickly.</p>

<p>So always remember: no company will ever quote you project cost based on Clock Time; it&#8217;s always based on Work Time (or Value).  And if you are lucky enough to be a defense contractor working with the US government, well&#8230; you can also include materials like a $20,000 Pentel mechanical pencil.  Hey relax &mdash; it needed special security clearance!  (And it&#8217;s just taxpayer money anyway).</p>

<p>Now, make some room on the couch.  The Stanley Cup&#8217;s on and I&#8217;ve got plenty to be screaming about.  And right now, it&#8217;s not the refs&#8230;</p>


					
				
					]]></content>
	</entry>


</feed>
